After the Cold War EU defense budgets declined and
with it it’s military hardware. EU maritime forces are at an all-time low but
they still have to perform a wide array of tasks like:
·
Maritime
interventions near the African continent, either being piracy at Somalia or
maritime cooperation between African countries and the EU or intervention in
conflicts.
· A rapidly
changing maritime balance of powers in the Mediterranean Sea with Turkey and
Algeria as rising maritime powers, as well as unresolved conflicts such as the
Syrian civil war and the Palastine conflict.
· A more
assertive Russia that is increasing its naval capabilities in both numbers and
technology. Combined with the US pivot towards Asia this would leave EU on its
own to counter Russia and protect the North Atlantic trade between the EU and
the USA.
EU maritime forces thus
have a wide array of tasks to perform. Member states such as the United Kingdom
and France are also looking towards the Indian Ocean where they still have
several colonies like the island of La Réunion and Mayotte. At the same time
the EU is very dependent on trade with Asia and these trade lines run through
the Indian Ocean.
Although India makes for a logical case for a maritime partnership there are some downsides.
First, siding with India would anger China as both countries have bad relations with each other. Since most of our trade comes from China this could have long lasting and far going economic consequences. At the same time it would cause bad relations with Pakistan as both India and Pakistan have bad relations because of the border region of Kashmir that both countries claim.
There are a wide array
of potential security threats to our trade lines. Piracy around the Horn of
Africa is just one example. An Iranian blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would
be devastating to the EU’s energy supply. Piracy in the Strait of Malacca will
have the same effects for EU trade as piracy around the Horn of Africa.
There is a need for a
EU maritime presence in the Indian Ocean but given the fact that the EU
maritime forces are at an all-time low and with other theaters demanding
attention as well, the EU has few maritime assets I can deploy in this region.
A maritime partnership would therefore be in the EU’s best interests. Of all
the surrounding maritime powers, either already established or on the rise,
only India would make a good partner.
The Indian navy already
has lots of experience and is expanding its navy even further. It has shown on
several occasions, either in international training exercises or in the
anti-piracy operation in the Gulf of Aden, that it can cooperate and integrate
its naval forces with other countries.
Another advantage is
India’s strategic location as the subcontinent sits in the middle of the Indian
Ocean. This allows India to respond to a
lot of potential security threats such as piracy in the Gulf of Aden, a
possible blockade by Iran of the Strait of Hormuz, operating along the east
coast of Africa or intervening in the Strait of Malacca. India also dominates
the EU’s vital trading routes from and towards Asia. India would be a vital
partner that can act to a wide array of crises and conflicts in the Indian
ocean region on behalf of the EU. This would allow the EU to focus the majority
of its naval forces in other theaters.
Ties between India and
the EU are generally perceived as good. Several EU member states have defense
contracts with the Indian Army. France for example is delivering Raphale aircraft
to India in 2016. As India is an upcoming regional power with a lot of economic
potential a collaboration between the EU on both a military and economic level
would be in the interests of both nations.Although India makes for a logical case for a maritime partnership there are some downsides.
First, siding with India would anger China as both countries have bad relations with each other. Since most of our trade comes from China this could have long lasting and far going economic consequences. At the same time it would cause bad relations with Pakistan as both India and Pakistan have bad relations because of the border region of Kashmir that both countries claim.
And at last there is
the Russian angle. India tends to buy its military hardware from pretty much
everyone who can deliver it. Still, it tends to buy most of its equipment from
Russia and both countries are known to collaborate on military research. The
BrahMos supersonic cruise missile was a joint Indian-Russian development.
India’s aircraft carrier, the Vikramaditya, used to be the former Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier of the
Soviet/Russian Navy. So there is a risk that military technology from the EU given to India could end up in
Russian hands and from there on out in Chinese hands.
In conclusion we could
say the a maritime cooperation with the Indian navy would be in the best
interests for the EU on a maritime level. It allows the EU to use the few
maritime assets it has in other theaters that are equally important. On the
downside it would alienate the EU from China, its biggest economic partner and
possibly lead to a spillover of military technology to Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment